Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Cibro Oceana Terminal Corp.

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided July 14, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*150OPINION OF THE COURT

Megan Tallmer, J.

Pursuant to CPL 170.30 and 170.35, defendant has moved to dismiss the information on the ground that it does not allege facts of an evidentiary nature sufficient to support the charges. The legal issue raised by this motion is whether the People may cure an insufficient information by filing a superseding information alleging additional facts.

The original accusatory instrument in this case was a complaint by Inspector Paul Kopelman that defendant willfully neglected and refused to comply with an order of the New York City Fire Commission, a copy of which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. CadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. TwineCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1983
  5. People v. LunneyNew York Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. GreenNassau County District Court · 2002
  2. People v. CobbCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
  3. People v. McDonaldCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
  4. People v. MorelCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
  5. People v. ClinkscalesNew York District Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API