Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2003No. 82133PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Michael J. Corrigan, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant Carol A. Jones filed a motion to suppress evidence of drugs seized from her. She maintained that the police lacked a reasonable suspicion that she had engaged in criminal activity, and further argued that the police conducted an illegal strip search of her in the field. After the court denied the motion to suppress, Jones pleaded no contest to charges of possession of drugs, trafficking in drugs, and possession of criminal tools. The court found Jones guilty, and this appeal followed.

{¶ 2} When reviewing the court’s ruling on a motion to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. City of BrunswickDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API