Legal Opinion
Oliver v. Zoning Commission
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 11, 1974No. File No. 5352PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant Mary Sepowski is the owner of premises in the town of Chester which, on the institution of this action, were known as 62 Middlesex Avenue but have since been renumbered as 86 Middlesex Avenue under General Statutes § 7-120. The property consists of a large dwelling set back from the street on a substantially landscaped and well-screened lot having a frontage of 240 feet and an area considerably in excess of the one-half acre required by its zoning classification, residential district R-1/2. Containing an in-ground swimming pool, the property has the appearance of a small estate.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Beckish v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Planning & Zoning Commission v. Synanon Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Jeffery v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Sumara v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Berger v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Stewart B. McKinney Foundation, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
- Costley v. Caromin House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Blevins v. Barry-Lawrence County Ass'n for Retarded CitizensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.