Legal Opinion
Slimp v. Department of Liquor Control
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 31, 1996No. 15454PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, C. J.
This appeal arises out of a license suspension ordered, after a hearing, by the department of liquor control (department). The plaintiffs, Gambrinus Importing Company, Inc.,1 backer, and John R. Slimp, permittee, were summoned to the hearing to show cause why their out-of-state shipper’s beer permit should not be suspended or another penalty imposed for certain alleged violations of the Liquor Control Act and departmental regulations.2 After the hearing, the department found that the plaintiffs had committed multiple violations of General Statutes §§ 30-943 and 30-63 (b),4 and *601§ 30-6-A29 (a)5…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Light Rigging Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Eder Bros. v. Wine Merchants of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- In re Jonathan M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Conn Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC v. SeagullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Singh v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.