Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal, stripped of confusing details, is as follows: During the years 1922 and 1923, a number of companies were affiliated under section 240(b) of the Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 260). Most of the affiliates had net losses in their incomes for 1922, which they were entitled to carry over to the year 1923 under section 204 (b), 42 Stat. 231. The carried over loss in one instance was more than enough to cancel the income of that affiliate for the year 1923, thus leaving a minus quantity which under section 204(b) the affiliate, had it stood…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Warren v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Commissioner v. Trustees of Lumber Inv. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Wilson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
- S. Slater & Sons, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Seiberling Rubber Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.