Seiberling Rubber Co. v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
During the years 1922 and 1923 the petitioner, a Delaware corporation, was affiliated with the Portage Rubber Company and the Lehigh Rubber Company within the meaning of section 240 (e) of the Revenue Acts of 1921 and 1924 (42 Stat. 260; 43 Stat. 288 [26 USCA § 99-3 note]). The affiliates filed a consolidated income tax return for those years. In 1922 each of them sustained a loss. In 1923 the petitioner made a profit, but each of the other two affiliates sustained a loss. On February 18,1924, the Seiberling Rubber Company, an Ohio corporation, was brought into the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Beneficial Loan Soc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Rear v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Rubel v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- S. Slater & Sons, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941