Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Driver

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1907No. Civ. No. 325PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment quieting title and from an order denying motion to vacate such judgment.

Plaintiff filed his complaint under section 738, Code of Civil Procedure, for the purpose of determining adverse claims to certain described real estate. To this complaint ap pellants were not made parties, but the court by its order, good cause appearing, granted appellants leave to intervene, which they did by filing their several complaints in intervention, denying plaintiff’s ownership of the premises, or that he was in possession or entitled to possession thereof; and each complaint in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People Ex Rel. Fogg v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. South Tule Independent Ditch Co. v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. St. Charles St. R. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Henry v. Vineland Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bamforth v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Save Oxnard Shores v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Marc Bellaire, Inc. v. FleischmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Safwenberg v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Haney v. KinevanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API