Legal Opinion

St. Charles St. R. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 2, 1903No. 14,102PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from civil district court, parish of Orleans; Walter B. So-mmerville, Judge. Action by the St. Charles Street Railroad Company against the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Limited, and others, judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Pleadings and Facts.

MONROE, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing its suit on an exception of no cause of action.

The petition is as follows:

“To- the Honorable the Judges of the Civil

District Court for the Parish of Orleans:

“The petition of the St. Charles St. Railroad Company, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Louisiana, domiciled in this city, and herein represented by its president, Albert G. Phelps, with respect represents:
“That Peter Johnson and E. J. Dare, both of whom reside in this city, and the Fidelity & Deposit Company, a corporation duly organized…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Macready v. SchenckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  2. Johnson v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Ricks v. GanttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Texas Railroad v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  5. John Crossley & Sons, Ltd. v. Commissioners of the Louisiana Savings Bank & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1886

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Neal v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Townsend v. DriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Board of Com'rs v. Howard Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. Bogan v. ByromLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API