Grimm v. Town of Washburn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Bayfield county: John 3L Parish, Circuit Judge. This is an action brought to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiff’s team by reason of the defective condition of a certain bridge in the defendant town. The plaintiff had judgment for $150, from -which this appeal is taken.
1Opinion of the CourtBardeen, J.
We have not been favored by any assignment of errors, but are left to a consideration of appellant’s entire argument to determine the grounds of its appeal. A statement is made that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but counsel fads to state in what particular the complaint is bad. If the attorney is unable to give any reason for the faith that is in him, we shall not help him to a reversal by hunting through the record to ascertain whether his faith is well founded. Again, he says, admitting that the complaint does state a cause of action, there…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spearbracker v. Town of LarrabeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Shaw v. President of the Sun PrairieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Koenig v. Town of ArcadiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hallum v. Village of OmroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Green v. Town of NebagamainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Prestin v. BaumgartnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- McHugh v. Town of MinocquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Bjelde v. DolanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.