Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Vail

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 15, 1960No. 13,100PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

This case brings up for review the admissibility in evidence of a statement made by Brazier before trial.

A charge of larceny of certain guns belonging to the United States, including two machine guns, was lodged against the accused and another airman, all of whom were stationed at the Sidi Slimane Air Base, Morocco. At trial each accused was represented by separate counsel. The prosecution showed that the base authorities suspected an attempt would be made to steal guns from a warehouse on the night of March 31, 1958, for later sale to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. BennettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. DandaneauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. NowlingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. MinnifieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. LoukasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. DyjakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API