Legal Opinion
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. Cunningham
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided January 5, 1932No. 647PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUM, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity seeking the cancellation of three life insurance policies, issued by complainant to the defendant Cunningham, upon the ground that in his written application for the insurance defendant knowingly made material misrepresentation of facts.
The controversy grows out of the following question and answer in the- application for the policies:
“7. What injuries, or illnesses, or treatments by or consultations with physicians or practitioners, have you had during last seven years? Give particulars of your illness, injury, consultation or treatment.
“Answer:…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. GistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Newhouse v. Board of Osteopathic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- New York Life Ins. v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1932
- Shaw v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Brook J. Jones and J. Fred Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.