In Re the Support Obligation of Loomis
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice (on reassignment).
[¶ 1.] In this opinion we hold that, under the facts of this case, the mother of an out-of-wedlock child is barred by the equitable doctrines of laches and estoppel from receiving retroactive child support.1
FACTS
[¶ 2.] In October 1982, David Loomis and Linda Teller had a brief sexual encounter in Gillette, Wyoming. Teller gave birth on July 15, 1983. Neither during the pregnancy nor afterwards did she tell Loomis that he fathered her child, even though they both lived in Gillette for approximately three years after the birth.2
[¶ 3.] When she was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Whalen v. WhalenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Conway v. ConwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Parker v. IrizarryUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Crouse v. CrouseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Faulk v. FaulkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Fox v. BurdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- WATERTOWN COOP. ELEVATOR v. Dept. of Rev.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Mathis v. MathisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.