Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Mathis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Allan Mathis (Allan) brought a petition for modification of his child support payments payable to his former spouse, Beth Mathis (Beth). The circuit court adopted the child support referee’s recommendation that Allan did not provide sufficient information establishing a change in income that would warrant a modification of his child support payments. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Allan and Beth Mathis were divorced on March 23, 1998. At the time of the divorce, Allan and Beth had six children; two children were over age eighteen and four were still minors. The couple entered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Whalen v. WhalenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Horne v. CrozierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kehn v. HoeksemaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re SchmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kauth v. BartlettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wagner v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gisi v. GisiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Dahl v. DahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. (Meyerink) Linge v. MeyerinkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API