Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Crouse

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1] In a divorce action involving the custody of three children, the trial court found the husband was not the father of the oldest boy and granted custody to the mother. The court also awarded her the parties’ two biological children pursuant to the rule which restricts splitting half-siblings. The husband appeals asserting the court never considered the best interests of the children. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

Facts

[¶ 2] Stephanie and Matthew Crouse were married in Carroll, Iowa on September 10, 1990. In January 1993, they separated and Stephanie…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. HosbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Boyles v. BoylesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. In Re DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Mayer v. MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Fuerstenberg v. FuerstenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bell v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Cleveland v. TinagliaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. D. G. v. D. M. K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API