Connor v. Thornton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.
Bert L. Connor and his wife, Vicie, sought to enjoin D. P. and R. E. Thornton from operating a sawmill on lands without the corporate limits of Hot Springs, an allegation being that because of proximity to their residence, value of the property and its utility as a home were impaired. The prayer was for abatement of the so-called nuisance, and for $2,000 to compensate damages. The complaint was dismissed on motion when the Court found as a matter of law that the plaintiffs were of a class, and that rights had been previously adjudicated.
Facts were that in 1942 and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- McCarroll, Commissioner of Revenues v. FarrarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Lightle v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Eddy v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ross v. Arkansas Communities, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Slade v. GammillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Holthoff v. State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Mixon v. Barton Lumber & Brick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Glenn v. Hoerner Boxes, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.