Legal Opinion

Connor v. Thornton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 8, 1945No. 4-7489PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

Bert L. Connor and his wife, Vicie, sought to enjoin D. P. and R. E. Thornton from operating a sawmill on lands without the corporate limits of Hot Springs, an allegation being that because of proximity to their residence, value of the property and its utility as a home were impaired. The prayer was for abatement of the so-called nuisance, and for $2,000 to compensate damages. The complaint was dismissed on motion when the Court found as a matter of law that the plaintiffs were of a class, and that rights had been previously adjudicated.

Facts were that in 1942 and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McCarroll, Commissioner of Revenues v. FarrarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Lightle v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Eddy v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ross v. Arkansas Communities, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Slade v. GammillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Holthoff v. State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. Mixon v. Barton Lumber & Brick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  5. Glenn v. Hoerner Boxes, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API