Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Holmes
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 29, 1996No. 95-4185-SACPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion to remand. (Dk. 6). The plaintiff argues the removal is proeedurally defective for several reasons. Her principal attacks are that the defendant Darren J. Holmes (“Holmes”) did not join the notice of removal and that the notice of removal was not timely filed within the thirty-day period that commenced once Holmes was served with the original complaint. Both defendants oppose the motion to remand.
BACKGROUND
This action arises from an automobile accident in Manhattan, Kansas, on October 30, 1993.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Jane Doe v. Allied-Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Jernigan v. Ashland Oil Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- McShares, Inc. v. BarryDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Chavez v. KincaidDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
- Codapro Corp. v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Williams v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Newman v. Spectrum Stores, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.