Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Michigan Club

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Garnishment proceedings by Edward J. Dunn against the Michigan Club, as garnishee of gliomas Swan and others. The Union Trust Company intervened as claimant of the fund. From a judgment in favor of claimant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the defendant Swan. On the 21st of February, 1896, he caused a writ of garnishment to issue, directed to the Michigan Club. The defendant Swan was engaged in the business of restaurant keeper and caterer. On the 1st day of May, 1893, he executed a mortgage, now vested in the Union Trust Company, by which he mortgaged all his stock in trade, and also mortgaged and assigned all book accounts, notes, etc., “owned by him, or appearing on the *410books of said business now being conducted by him at the place aforesaid, and all future book accounts representing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Preston National Bank v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Preston National Bank v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Fuller v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Heermans v. BlakesleeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Clark v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  4. Chrysler Corporation v. Long & Long, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1958
  5. Clark v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API