Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Rhodes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J,) Garnishment. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiffs in February, 1888, brought an action of assumpsit against defendant, Charles H. Rhodes, in the circuit court of Bay county, and on February 29, 1888, a writ of garnishment was issued out of that court in the cause, directed to the Michigan Central Railroad Company as garnishee. Disclosure was made by the railroad company, admitting an indebtedness of $600. After-"wards a second disclosure was filed by the garnishee, *38also admitting the indebtedness of $600, but disclosing that the moneys were claimed by W. I. Brotherton & Co., on the ground that they had a chattel mortgage bearing…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kunkel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dunn v. Michigan ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Merchants' National Bank v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Flood v. ButzbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. James River Bank v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API