Legal Opinion

Preston National Bank v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Petition by complainant to compel the payment of certain moneys claimed under a prior decree. Complainant .appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 84 Mich. 364.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The assignment and facts out of which this controversy has arisen will be found in 84 Mich. 364. Under that decision a decree was entered giving the complainant “a lien upon all moneys collected by the said defendants Emerson and Eldred, as assignees and as receivers, upon said accounts, and upon all notes, bills receivable, lands, goods, chattels, and other things taken in compromise, satisfaction, or partial or complete discharge .or payment of said accounts. The receivers proceeded under this decree to collect the various accounts and debts due to the purifier company. In keeping their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Preston National Bank v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Winemiller v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Dunn v. Michigan ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Britton v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API