Legal Opinion
Gillette Company v. Williams
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 17, 1973No. Civ. 15452PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION *
Z AMP ANO, District Judge.
In this contract action for damages and injunctive relief, the plaintiff, The Gillette Company (“Gillette”), has filed an application for a preliminary injunction pending the outcome of a full trial on the merits of its claim that the defendant violated the provisions of a post-employment restrictive covenant. In effect, Gillette seeks to restrain its former employee, Peter S. Williams, from continuing to work for a competitor, the Warner-Lambert Company, Schick Safety Razor Division (“Schick”).
In addition to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- E. W. Bliss Company v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., P. G. Bartlett, L. K. Clark, D. E. Henry and J. A. DingesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Continental Aviation & Engineering Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Dieter Hulsenbusch v. The Davidson Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Mixing Equipment Co., Inc. v. Philadelphia Gear, Inc., and George Leamy. Appeal of George LeamyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Continental Group, Inc. v. KinsleyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1976