Legal Opinion

Joy Klein v. Dow Corning Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 1, 1981No. 1, Docket 81-7270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Joy Klein of New York sued Dow Corning, Inc., of Michigan, fourteen years after Dow Coming products were surgically implanted in her breasts but approximately one year after the implants allegedly burst or ruptured. Sitting in diversity jurisdiction, the district court applied New York law, 1 2and dismissed the suit on summary judgment as time barred. The court held that the statute of limitations ran from the date of injury, which the court interpreted as the date of implantation. We reverse.

The following facts are asserted by the plaintiff and not contested by the defendant. Dow Corning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Thornton v. Roosevelt HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Murphy v. St. Charles HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. William Klepper, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Ace American Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Group Health Inc. v. Blue Cross Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Kristeller v. A.H. Robins, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1983
  3. Pozefsky v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API