Legal Opinion

Pozefsky v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided June 27, 2000No. 92-CV-314 (LEK/RWS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER

KAHN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are (i) defendant Baxter’s motion to compel, (ii) Plaintiffs’ motion to extend time to conclude expert disclosure, (iii) Plaintiffs’ motion to allow additional expert disclosure, (iv) defendant Baxter’s motion for summary judgment, and (v) defendant Baxter’s motion to strike Plaintiffs supplemental memorandum of law in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, motions (i) and (v) granted; motions (ii) and (iii) are denied; and motion (iv) granted-in-part and denied-in-part.

I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Heller v. U. S. Suzuki Motor Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Martin v. Edwards LaboratoriesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API