Hale v. Gardiner
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Plaintiff brought suit upon a promissory note executed by the defendants March 30, 1917, payable one year after date. The complaint stated a cause of action. Defendants answered, admitting the allegations of the complaint. After admitting the making of the note and its nonpayment, defendants allege that the note was made in connection with the formation of a corporation and in pursuance of a written agreement, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of the answer. It is alleged that in pursuance of this agreement the plaintiff advanced two thousand dollars for expenses in connection…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Jamison v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Murphy v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Crosby v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Scofield v. State National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Cammann v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Schwab v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Silver v. Beverly Hills National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Patterson v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.