Cammann v. Edwards
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.
Action to recover the sum of $37,500 because of certain alleged stock transactions. Each party filed motion for judgment on the pleadings. Defendants' motion was sustained and plaintiff’s motion was overruled. Judgment was rendered for defendant and plaintiff appealed.
A consideration of the pleadings is necessary in order to determine the propriety of the trial court’s disposition of the two^ motions. The pleadings are lengthy. The facts pleaded will be stated and considered in connection with the questions discussed.
The gist of plaintiff’s petition is that he employed defendants as his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Simmons Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- State ex rel. McEntee v. BrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Bradley v. BeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Hogg v. WhithamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Wagner v. FieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Machens v. MachensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Munday v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Ellen Gregg Ingalls v. Ingalls Iron Works CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Hunter v. Delta Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.