Legal Opinion

Smelcer v. Rippetoe

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 3, 1940No. 2PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilor, J.

Complainants filed their original bill in this cause for the purpose of permanently enjoining the defendant from repairing and maintaining a dam across Lick Creek in Greene County. There are nineteen complainants to the bill, and they claim that they own lands on said creek which they claim would be irreparably damaged by the repairing and maintenance of said dam. It is their insistence that defendant has not acquired any right to ■ construct or maintain the dam complained of, and that they are entitled to have same permanently enjoined because of the nature of the damages resulting therefrom.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Coal & Iron Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ferguson v. PrinceTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Woods v. BonnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Davis v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Boyd v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hall v. PippinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Cottrell v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  3. Hallmark v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Rogers v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  5. State ex rel. Phillips v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API