Ferguson v. Prince
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Knox Connty —Will D. Weight, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
These were two separate cases tried in the chancery conrt of Knox connty, being ejectments for distinct lots of land in the city of Knoxville, bnt, the evidence being mnch the same in both, they were consolidated for purposes of hearing, and disposed of by the chancellor in one decree and appealed to this conrt under one transcript. The chancellor dismissed the bill in each case, and the complainants have appealed.
The bill in the first case sought to recover a part of lot No. 112 in McAnally’s addition to Knoxville; the part sued for being accurately described in the record.
The determinative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Drewery v. NelmsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Woods v. BonnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Saunders v. SimpsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Gernt v. FloydTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Dunn v. EatonTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Phillips v. Pittsburgh Consolidated Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Davis v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Johnson v. FordTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Hallmark v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.