Gersema v. Allstate Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 James Gersema appeals the trial court’s affirmance of the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals’ decision allowing his self-insured employer, Allstate Insurance Company, to offset his potential future industrial insurance benefits against his “excess recovery”1 from a third party tortfeasor responsible for his industrial injury. Gersema argues that this offset, authorized under RCW 51.24.060, is an unconstitutional taking of his property, namely general damages, for which Allstate has paid him no benefits.
Hunt, J. —
¶2 We affirm, holding that (1) RCW 51.24.060 is not unconstitutional, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BlilieWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Flanigan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Retired Public Employees Council v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GlasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tobin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Tobin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Waples v. YiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Waples v. YiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Jones v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.