Legal Opinion

State v. Blilie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1997No. 64799-2PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

In this case we are asked to decide whether RCW 10.64.025(2), which prohibits the release of persons convicted of sex offenses pending sentencing, is unconstitutional for violating the separation of powers doctrine of the Washington Constitution or the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We hold the statute was not enacted in violation of the separation of powers doctrine, nor does it violate the equal protection clause. The order of the trial court is reversed.

FACTS

On September 27, 1996, Mark Blilie, Respondent, was convicted by a jury of one count of communicating with a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Parentage of CAMAWashington Supreme Court · 2005

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API