Legal Opinion

Collins Hotel Co. v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1906No. Civ. No. 248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, from an order denying a new trial, and from an order refusing to vacate the judgment and to enter a judgment for appellant. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and an order denying the plaintiff’s motion to vacate the judgment and to enter a judgment in its favor. The suit was brought for breach of an agreement of the defendant with plaintiff’s assignor, of date October 1, 1903, for the lease of a lot of land in the city of Los Angeles near the northeast corner of Third and Olive streets, with a hotel building thereon to be constructed, according to the plans and specifications specified, under the following provision of the contract : ‘ ‘ Said first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In Re NewellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baird v. Wendt Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. National Pavements Corp. v. Hutchinson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Rose v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API