Legal Opinion
Northrop Corp. v. Triad Financial Establishment
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 4, 1984No. CV83-7945, CV83-7948PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TASHIMA, District Judge.
These are consolidated actions to, respectively, vacate and confirm an arbitration award against Northrop Corporation (“Northrop”) and in favor of Triad Financial Establishment and Triad International Marketing, S.A. (collectively “Triad”). Arbitration was initiated by Triad in 1979. After lengthy proceedings involving Triad’s claims to approximately $153 million in commission payments, the arbitration tribunal (the “tribunal”) made an award to Triad in the amount of $31,477,378.
BACKGROUND
The Marketing Agreement
On October 4, 1970, in an effort to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Trans Chemical Ltd. & China National MacHiney Import & Export Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Asamera (South Sumatra) Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1992
- Triad Financial Establishment v. Tumpane Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.