Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Hinsley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.

The ultimate question on this appeal is whether the trial court was correct in its determination of the ownership of three bank accounts payable to the plaintiff’s decedent or the named defendant or the survivor, and of two bank accounts payable to the plaintiff’s decedent or the defendant Thomas C. Cagney or the survivor.

The finding, in so far as it is not attacked, sets forth the following facts: Thomas C. O’Connor died on December 16,1951, and the plaintiff is the administrator of his estate. Catherine E. Hinsley was his niece and Thomas C. Cagney his nephew. O’Connor had lived in Mrs.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Kriedel v. KrampitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Graybill v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Colby's v. PoorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  5. Bachmann v. ReardonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kukanskis v. JasutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Capozzi v. LucianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Lage v. Central Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
  4. Perkins v. CorkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. Halisey v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API