Legal Opinion
Baker v. Fryar
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1966No. 7824PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOISE, Justice.
The plaintiffs in the instant case are husband and wife. Plaintiff, Byard Baker, seeks damages for medical expenses suffered by his wife. Plaintiff, Rose Baker, seeks damages for the injuries received by her. Defendant, Fryar, was a contractor who, by arrangement with the Board of Governors of the Officer’s Open Mess at Walker Air Force Base, undertook to install pipes for a water sprinkling system under roadways and parking areas before the same were paved. The work undertaken by defendant was completed August 11, 1959, and was accepted and paid for on September 1, 1959.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Strakos v. GehringTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Helen Hanna, Cicero Hanna v. Annie C. Fletcher, Trustee of Estate of Florence Johnson, Benjamin F. Fletcher, and Fred S. Gichner Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Thompson v. AndermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. BurkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- New Mexico Electric Service Co. v. MontanezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Tipton v. Texaco, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Samora v. BradfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.