Legal Opinion

Keith v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1934No. 30978PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-owen, J.

Keith brought an action at law to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him, and for the value of a motorcar wrecked in the collision in which he was injured. At the conclusion of the evidence of the appellant Keith, in the lower court, a peremptory instruction was granted for the appellee, Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Company.

Two propositions of law are submitted by the appellee, which, it contends, sustains the action of the lower court; First, that there was no negligence on the part of appellee; and, second, that the act complained of against the appellee was not the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WoodhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Dean v. BrannonMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Memphis Consol. Gas & Electric Co. v. CreightonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. Bufkin v. Louisville N.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Stove Manufacturing Company v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Atchison v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hudson v. GraceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Pitcairn v. WhitesideIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Matthews v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API