Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Northwest purchases natural gas from defendants. Northwest originally filed a complaint in state court, removed here pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, seeking a declaration of the effect federal oil and gas deregulation has had upon the contractual rights and obligations of the parties. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Several motions are currently pending before me 1 : (1) defendants’ motion that I reconsider plaintiff’s leave to file its second amended complaint; (2) plaintiff’s motion to remand Cabot Petroleum; and (3)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blum v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mississippi Power & Light Company v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, State of Mississippi, Plaintiff-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. United States/United States Department of Agriculture Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. JER PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corporation, Renamed Williams Natural Gas Company v. Jer Partnership Ellis Petroleum Corporation, Inc. Yuma County Oil Corporation, Inc. Prima Energy Corporation Alpar Resources, Inc. Talus Properties Ltd. John P. Lockridge, Northwest Central Pipeline Corporation, Renamed Williams Natural Gas Company v. Jer Partnership Yuma County Oil Corporation, Inc., and Ellis Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991