Tomason v. Stanley
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Sherry Tomason’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses. ECF No. 27. Tomason argues nine of Defendants’ twenty affirmative defenses fail for factual and legal insufficiencies. Id. Defendants contend that affirmative defenses need only provide adequate notice to Plaintiffs of the assertions that Defendants intend to litigate and thus that Defendants here adequately pled their defenses. ECF No. 32 at 4. Although Defendants articulate the proper legal standard, some of their defenses still fail. The Court therefore GRANTS…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Joan Hassan, Dinesh Hassan v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- In Re Rawson Food Service, Inc., Debtor. Flav-O-Rich, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Rawson Food Service, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luxottica Group, S.P.A. v. Airport Mini Mall, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Sch. Bd. of Broward Cnty. v. C.B.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
- Davis v. HolifieldDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2021
- McNeal v. Fram Renewable Fuels LLC.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
- Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et al. v. Rowlo, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.