Legal Opinion

McNeal v. Fram Renewable Fuels LLC.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided July 14, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00116Unknown

1Opinion

In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Brunswick Division CARLEY MCNEAL, Plaintiff, 2:24-CV-116 v. FRAM RENEWABLE FUELS, Defendant. ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Affirmative Defenses,” which the Court construes as a motion to strike insufficient defenses contained in Defendant’s answer. Dkt. No. 11. The motion has been fully briefed, and it is ripe for review. Dkt. Nos. 11, 12, 13, 15. The Court heard oral argument on June 30, 2025. Dkt. No. 29. For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Enora Perez v. Wdlls Fargo N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Davis v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API