Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Leonard

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1921No. Civ. No. 3733PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The plaintiff, a boy between' thirteen and fourteen years of age, brings this action through his guardian ad litem, to recover damages for injuries sustained by him through being struck by an automobile driven by the defendant, the complaint charging the defendant with negligence and carelessness in the conduct of his machine. The answer denied such negligence and alleged that the plaintiff himself through his own negligence was the cause of the collision.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury. It made findings of fact against the contention of the plaintiff and in favor of that of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Mayne v. San Diego Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Charves v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Spring v. TawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Genta v. IllingworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pope v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Fate v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API