Legal Opinion
Fate v. Gross
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1923No. Civ. No. 4409PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant H. M. Gross appeals from a judgment rendered against him in an action brought by the plaintiff, Lewis A. Fate, for damages on account of personal injuries sustained by the latter as a result of a collision between the defendant’s automobile and plaintiff’s motorcycle.
The action against appellant’s codefendant Todd Protectograph Company, a corporation, was dismissed on a motion for a nonsuit.
The trial was had before the court sitting without a jury, and the court found that the defendant was and that the plaintiff was not guilty of negligence. The question of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Mayne v. San Diego Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Charves v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Spring v. TawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Genta v. IllingworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moore v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942