Legal Opinion
Lamkin v. Bowen
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 14, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-K-1768PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This is an appeal from a final decision of the defendant Secretary under the Social Security Act. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). It is conceded that the decision appealed from is the defendant’s final decision and is therefore subject to judicial review.
I have examined the entire record on appeal and reviewed the briefs filed by the parties. Accordingly, I find that oral argument would not be of material benefit in deciding this appeal and therefore dispense with it.
The plaintiff is a twenty-four year old man…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenneth and Karen Rothschild v. Charles Grottenthaler, Superintendent of the Ramapo Central School District, and Ramapo Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. v. Committee on Anticompetitive ConductSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Klickitat County v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1991
- Ayers v. EspyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994