Legal Opinion

Srager v. Koenig

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 27, 1994No. 14043PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The plaintiffs, Leslie Srager and Joan Srager, appeal from the order discharging a notice of lis pendens. The defendant asserts in his motion to dismiss that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal because it was filed after the expiration of the seven day appeal period specified by General Statutes § 52-325c (b).1 We agree.

The plaintiffs brought a breach of contract action seeking damages and an injunction compelling the defendant to convey to them certain property located in Fairfield in accordance with an agreement between the parties. The plaintiffs recorded a notice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Second Injury Fund v. LupachinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Srager v. KoenigConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Burke Construction, Inc. v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Faryniarz v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API