American Pneumatic Service Co. v. Snyder
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Equity. Suit by the American Pneumatic Service Company and another against William G. Snyder and others. On exceptions by defendants to master’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
REEESTAB, District Judge.
The defendants have been held to infringe patent No. 658,102, for improvements in pneumatic dispatch systems. 180 Bed. 712, 104 C. C. A. 78. The master, on a reference for an accounting, found that the defendants had used such system 641 days, and that the savings amounted to $6 a day, aggregating the sum of $3,846.
The proceedings before the master were limited to the question of profits (savings) realized by- the defendants from the use of the infringing system, as they were users of, and not manufacturers of, or dealers in, said devices. The defendants have filed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- McCreary v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wales v. Waterbury Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. U. S. Rubber Reclaiming WorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1920
- Empire Rubber & Tire Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.