Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming Works
District Court, W.D. New York
In -Equity. Suit by the Philadelphia Rubber Works Company against the United States Rubber Reclaiming Works, in which the defendant’s successor, the United States Rubber Reclaiming Company, Inc., was brought in as defendant, and later the Madison Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., was also brought in as defendant. On accounting in patent suit. Decree directed in accordance with opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZED, District Judge.
The plaintiff sued the United States Rubber Reclaiming Works in equity for infringement of letters patent Nd. 635,141 of October 17,1899, issued to Arthur H. Marks for a process “for reclaiming rubber from vulcanized rubber waste,” and consisting of an alkali process adaptable to reclaiming rubber scrap of boots and shoes, and the more highly vulcanized rubber mechanical goods scrap, hose, air. brake- hose, and tires, especially such as are used on automobiles.
It is shown that the Diamond Rubber Company acquired the letters patent in issue from the inventor, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Birdsall v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ozan Lumber Co. v. Davis Sewing Mach. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
- Ozan Lumber Co. v. Davis Sewing Mach. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
- Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Light & Heating Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1924
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Art Metal Const. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929