Wales v. Waterbury Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Cross Appeals from the 'Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
We agree with the conclusions of the learned judge who decided the cause in the court below as to the validity of claims 1, 2, and 3 of the patent in suit, and deem it unnecessary to add anything to his very satisfactory opinion. 87 Fed. 920. We are unable, however, to agree with his conclusions in respect to the amount of profits which the complainant was entitled to recover.
The patent is for an improved lever buckle, adapted for use upon various articles of men’s and women’s wearing apparel. The buclde of claim 3, as appears from the demand which it eventually…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hart v. EyckNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
- Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. v. Consolidated Safety Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Manufacturing Co. v. CowingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Yesbera v. Hardesty Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Brennan v. Dowagiac Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Columbia Wire Co. v. Kokomo Steel & Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
- Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. Zenith-Detroit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Armstrong v. Belding Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.