Legal Opinion

Brayman Construction Corporation v. Home Insurance Company Zurich North America Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 12, 2003No. 02-1316PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to decide whether a dispute between an insurance company and its insured must be arbitrated. In light of the strong federal policy favoring arbitration, we hold that the dispute is arbitrable and therefore reverse the District Court’s decision.

I. Background

Plaintiff Brayman Construction Corp. (“Brayman”) purchased a workers’ compensation insurance policy (the “Policy”), effective January 1, 1995, from The Home Insurance Co. (“Home”). The parties subsequently entered into a separate retrospective premium agreement (the “RPA”),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Margaret Palcko v. Airborne Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Lincoln Griswold v. Coventry First LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Provenzano, D. v. Ohio Valley General Hosp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Saltzman v. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Miron v. BDO Seidman, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API