Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1979No. 15916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Before us is an order of the Industrial Commission awarding compensation to respondent, Jeffrey Lynn Nelson, hereafter “Nelson”; Blair Sorenson, hereafter “Sor-enson,” appeals. We affirm. Costs are awarded to Nelson. All statutory references are to U.C.A.1953, unless otherwise indicated.

Sorenson and Nelson became acquainted while they were taking a class together at the University of Utah. Upon discovering Nelson could do carpenter work, Sorenson offered him $4.00 an hour to repair, remodel, and paint apartments. Between February and August of 1975, Nelson worked for and with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grow v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Billmayer v. SanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Kalmon v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Sommerville v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Jackson v. Cathcart & Maxfield, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thornbury v. AllenColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Board of Education of Alpine School District v. OlsenUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Virgil A. Adams v. State of Alaska, Workers' Compensation Benefits Guaranty Fund; Michael A. Heath d/b/a O&M Enterprise; and the Michael A. Heath TrustAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Bodensieck v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API