Legal Opinion
United States v. Estrada-Eliverio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 2009No. 07-50191PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
Luis Estrada-Eliverio appeals from his conviction and 63-month sentence imposed following a jury trial on one count of illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 1 In challenging his conviction, EstradaEliverio argues that the district court erroneously admitted documents from his immigration file (“A-file”) that were not properly authenticated at trial. He contends that the district court erred by allowing authentication under Federal Rule of Evidence (“FRE”) 901 and that, even if Rule 901 applied, the government did not satisfy the rule’s requirements. We must…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Chu Kong Yin, AKA Alfred ChuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. GrajedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. David Vernon TankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Liquidators of European Federal Credit BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Samuel Orozco-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Roberto LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Kaleena MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- American Fed'n of Musicians v. Paramount Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.