Legal Opinion

United States v. David Vernon Tank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 2000No. 98-10001PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant David Vernon Tank appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiring to sexually exploit a child for the purpose of producing a sexually explicit visual depiction in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a) and (d); conspiring to engage in the receipt and distribution of sexually explicit images of children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a) and (b)(1); and distributing sexually explicit images of a child to another person in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a).

Specifically, Tank appeals the district court’s decisions regarding: (1) the sufficiency of the foundation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. PonceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Charles Ira BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Roland A. SoulardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MATTA-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Tienda, Ronnie Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. United States v. Fred S. PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Lorraine v. Markel American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  4. United States v. William WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Mark Kevin HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API