Harleysville Worcester Insurance v. Paramount Concrete
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
This is an insurance coverage action relating to claims for damage to swimming pools constructed with defectively produced concrete, known as “shotcrete.” Plaintiff Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company (“Harleysville”) brought this declaratory judgment action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 1332(a)(1), against Paramount Concrete (“Paramount”), R.I. Pools, and Paramount’s excess liability insurer, Scottsdale Insurance Company, seeking a declaration that it has no duty to indemnify Paramount in underlying litigation brought by R.I.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of Johnstown, New York v. Bankers Standard Insurance Company, Pacific Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marcus v. Titan America, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024