Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Taylor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1982No. 2004PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in: (1) consolidating for trial offenses arising from two drug transactions; and (2) excluding his offer of prior recorded testimony of an unavailable witness. We hold that the charges were properly consolidated but that the testimony was erroneously excluded. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. '

I

Appellant was charged in three informations with several drug offenses arising from transactions with an undercover police officer and a paid police informant. The first two informations concerned…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. UlatoskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. MunchinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API