Commonwealth v. Taylor
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court erred in: (1) consolidating for trial offenses arising from two drug transactions; and (2) excluding his offer of prior recorded testimony of an unavailable witness. We hold that the charges were properly consolidated but that the testimony was erroneously excluded. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. '
I
Appellant was charged in three informations with several drug offenses arising from transactions with an undercover police officer and a paid police informant. The first two informations concerned…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. UlatoskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MunchinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.