Legal Opinion
Guy Harris Buick Co. v. Bryant
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 1925No. 14476PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtItILEY, J.
This is a suit on a promissorj note and for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff filed its petition against the ■defendant on the 7th day of February, 1922, praying for a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,000, with interest thereon, and for the sum of $125 attorney’s fee, its said claim being based upon a promissory note, and for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage.
Thereafter, and on March 22, 1922, a default judgment was rendered against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Crawford v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Condit v. ConditSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Tidewater Quarry Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Wyman v. HerardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- Meyer v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Watson v. American Creosote Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Wilson & Co. v. HickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Sestak v. CowanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.